Washington
How Several Judges Are Within The Supreme Court Of Washington News

Supreme Court reverses conviction in baby stabbing Bemidji Pioneer In doing so, the state's highest court took a stand on a debate over the role of forensic experts in criminal cases. Justices said medical examiners are mandated to be independent and neutral, and must objectively testify for either side, despite what Supreme Court reverses murder conviction in baby stabbing Minn. Supreme Court reverses conviction of mother found guilty of killing baby Nicole Beecroft, convicted of killing baby, will get new trial |
Conservatives worry that John Roberts will 'go wobbly' on 'Obamacare' Los Angeles Times This from a Wall Street Journal editorial: "You can tell the Supreme Court is getting closer to its historic Obamacare ruling because the left is making one last attempt to intimidate the justices. The latest effort includes taunting Chief Justice John Left Targets Chief Justice Roberts To Save ObamaCare The public trial of Justice Roberts Supreme Court Quickies |
![]() International Business Times | Big Money Corporate Spending in Elections May Lose in Supreme Court: Citizens San Francisco Chronicle (press release) WASHINGTON, DC (PRWEB) May 23, 2012 Citizens United, the controversial 2010 US Supreme Court decision that allows for virtually unlimited corporate spending in state elections, may face an immediate effective reversal if the Court refuses, Is the Corporate Personhood Reform Movement Doomed to Fail in Washington? After 'Citizens United,' is constitutional amendment needed? Citizens United II |
Don't mess with voting rights Los Angeles Times A federal appeals court has upheld the requirement that places with histories of discrimination 'pre-clear' changes in election procedures. The Supreme Court should honor that ruling. The US Supreme Court Building, located Capitol Hill in Washington, |
ICO Global Asks California Supreme Court to Appoint New Appellate Panel in MarketWatch (press release) ICO's petition details how ICO's constitutional due process rights were violated because two Court of Appeal justices who recused themselves more than two years after the appeal was filed had participated in deliberations for an extended period during |
